The requirement of using standardized tests such as the SAT and ACT in undergraduate admissions decisions has long been debated. A recent report from the National Association for College Admission Council (NACAC) recommends that more colleges consider switching to a test-optional admissions policy. Although the report acknowledges that a blanket approach cannot be applied to all colleges, it states that The Commission encourages institutions to consider dropping the admission test requirements if it is determined that the predictive utility of the test or the admission policies of the institution (such as open access) support that decision and if the institution believes that standardized test results would not be necessary for other reasons such as course placement, advising, or research.
The reports agrees with the conventional wisdom that standardized tests are a strong predictor of first-year grades, and even agrees that they are a strong predictor of full four-year grades. Speaking about the SAT and ACT, the report states that The Commission is in agreement that the tests measure what they purport to measure. However, the authors recommend that overall college success be defined by a broader set of criteria than first-year grades. College success can be defined in terms of overall degree attainment, a range of GPAs, post-college employment, or progression to graduate school. When defined in this way, there are tests that may be even more predictive of overall college success than the SAT and ACT. These are the College Boards Advanced Placement exams and the International Baccalaureate Examinations. These tests have two benefits: First, they measure knowledge of portions of the actual high school curriculum. Second, there is little test prep industry around these exams, so students have less ability to buy their way to a good score.
Despite the Commissions recommendations, it acknowledges that high school students may experience some disadvantages if they do not take the usual standardized tests. For example, a students PSAT scores are used in the initial screen of eligibility for National Merit scholarships. A student that skips the PSAT passes up a scholarship opportunity. Additionally, colleges themselves have an incentive to require high SAT scores: the ranking tables of major publications depend heavily on a schools average test scores. In its report, the Commission recommends that these publications stop using test scores as a measure of institutional quality.
The passage suggests that colleges are reluctant to discontinue use of the SAT and ACT because
A. schools seek out students who receive National Merit scholarships, so that the school has to provide less financial aid
B. students with high test scores are more likely to finish a four-year degree on time
C. (D) the schools average SAT scores are weighted heavily in the ranking tables of major publications (E) they are the best standardized tests currently available for judging a students knowledge of portions of the
D. the schools average SAT scores are weighted heavily in the ranking tables of major publications
E. they are the best standardized tests currently available for judging a students knowledge of portions of the high school curriculum![]()
The reports agrees with the conventional wisdom that standardized tests are a strong predictor of first-year grades, and even agrees that they are a strong predictor of full four-year grades. Speaking about the SAT and ACT, the report states that The Commission is in agreement that the tests measure what they purport to measure. However, the authors recommend that overall college success be defined by a broader set of criteria than first-year grades. College success can be defined in terms of overall degree attainment, a range of GPAs, post-college employment, or progression to graduate school. When defined in this way, there are tests that may be even more predictive of overall college success than the SAT and ACT. These are the College Boards Advanced Placement exams and the International Baccalaureate Examinations. These tests have two benefits: First, they measure knowledge of portions of the actual high school curriculum. Second, there is little test prep industry around these exams, so students have less ability to buy their way to a good score.
Despite the Commissions recommendations, it acknowledges that high school students may experience some disadvantages if they do not take the usual standardized tests. For example, a students PSAT scores are used in the initial screen of eligibility for National Merit scholarships. A student that skips the PSAT passes up a scholarship opportunity. Additionally, colleges themselves have an incentive to require high SAT scores: the ranking tables of major publications depend heavily on a schools average test scores. In its report, the Commission recommends that these publications stop using test scores as a measure of institutional quality.
The passage suggests that colleges are reluctant to discontinue use of the SAT and ACT because
A. schools seek out students who receive National Merit scholarships, so that the school has to provide less financial aid
B. students with high test scores are more likely to finish a four-year degree on time
C. (D) the schools average SAT scores are weighted heavily in the ranking tables of major publications (E) they are the best standardized tests currently available for judging a students knowledge of portions of the
D. the schools average SAT scores are weighted heavily in the ranking tables of major publications
E. they are the best standardized tests currently available for judging a students knowledge of portions of the high school curriculum
